Watch the SOC work a real case.
One phishing alert, end to end: the agent investigates and cites its evidence, you make the one call that needs a human, and the receipt shows everything. This is the product on demo data, not a video.
A reported phish just landed. So did everything else.
Three users reported the same message. In most SOCs this alert now waits in a queue behind a thousand others, and an analyst gets to it in hours if the shift is kind.
Here, an agent picked it up in seconds. Not just this one: every alert in this inbox gets a full investigation, including the ones that turn out to be nothing.
One incident, one story. Never three copies of the same work.
Before anyone investigates anything, the alert is checked against every open inquiry by the assets involved: users, hosts, senders. Three reports of the same phish become one case, not three tickets assigned to three people.
No open inquiry matches, so Soarcery opens one. Everything that happens next lives on this single thread.
The agent works the case and cites its sources.
This is the part legacy automation never did: the actual thinking. The agent pulls the message, enriches the indicators, reads the disagreement in the engine pool, and checks whether anyone clicked, the same steps a good analyst takes, in under a minute.
Every claim is pinned to a tool result you can open. Try the show reasoning toggle on the second message: nothing here asks for your trust, it shows you the work instead.
Confirmed phish, three mailboxes affected
confidence: high- ✓Sender domain registered 4 days ago, brand-impersonating name.
- ✓38 of 72 intel engines rate the link malicious; dissenters are lagging reputation feeds.
- ✓All four extracted IOCs match a public blocklist.
- ✓No recipient clicked. No credential exposure observed.
A conclusion you can read, not a score you have to trust.
The output of the investigation is a finding in plain language: what happened, the evidence for it, how confident the call is, and what to do about it. Stated confidence, listed evidence, named next steps.
Notice what it recommends and what it does not do: the consequential action waits. Quarantining mailboxes touches users, so it goes to the gate.
Confirmed phish with high confidence. Quarantine removes the message from all three inboxes before anyone clicks. Reversible: restoring the message takes one action if the verdict changes.
One decision needed a human. It's yours.
Ninety seconds of work happened without you. This is the moment that should not: an action that touches three users' mailboxes waits for explicit approval, with the evidence and the blast radius in front of you.
You set where this line sits, per use case. Teams start with everything gated, watch the agent be right, and dial up autonomy at their own pace. Go ahead, approve it.
Every step. Every source. Every decision. One trail.
This is what we mean by receipts. The whole case, from the alert landing to the mailboxes cleaned, is one replayable record: what ran deterministically, what the agent reasoned, what it cost, and which human approved the action that mattered.
Hand it to an auditor. Replay it after an incident review. Or just read it with your coffee, because the case closed in 98 seconds and nobody on your team touched a console.
Yours arrive by the thousand.
Bring one and watch it think.
A 30-minute walkthrough on your real triage flow, with the same receipts at the end. Technical, not a pitch.